Mary Milton Sound Recordist | Blog Index | About me | Credits | Contact

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Edirol R-09 - update your software!


If you, like me bought an Edirol R-09 some time ago it might be worth checking you have the most up to date software installed on it. The current version is 1.31 and is well worth it as it allows you to record to 16 Gig flash cards rather than the previous 2 Gig. When you turn your machine on the current software version flashes up in the lower left of the screen.

The latest software can be downloaded from http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?objectid=757 To install it you need the USB lead that came with your Edirol and a blank flash card (the data on mine did survive the process though). They also advise that you run the unit on mains power while upgrading. Installed fine via my mac too.

For the up to date software for the newer recorder, the Edirol R-09HR go to http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?ObjectId=960

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 20, 2009

Radio Mic "switch off" - last day to make your views count

Today is the closing date for responses to OFCOMs proposals to move channel 69 radio mic users to a new channel. So if you want your views to count respond online now!

The response form can be reached at: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/800mhz/howtorespond/

The Consultation document is downloadable from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/800mhz/

Labels: ,

Sound Devices 788T - Review by Keith Rodgerson



Keith Rodgerson has written a very comprehensive review of the Sound Devices 788T Which can be seen at http://www.keithrodgerson.com/keithrodgerson.com/Sound_Devices_788T.html

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Radio Mic "switch off" letter.

You can now download a very non-techie letter which is intended to explain the withdrawal of channel 69 to production companies and other interested parties. Please feel free to distribute it. Responses to OFCOM need to be received by 20th April 2009.

Labels: ,

Friday, April 3, 2009

New BECTU ratecard

New new ratecard for television factual has been published, it's available to download at:
http://www.bectu.org.uk/advice-resources/rates/television-factual-rates

Labels:

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Women in Sound

Today a student writing a dissertation sent me a list of questions about my job. I found answering them quite thought provoking so I thought I'd post the questions along with my answers here.

She asked a lot about being a woman in the industry and I have to say it's not something I often have cause to think about. I hope it's a debate that is becoming irrelevant. Anyway, if you want to know about my experience, read the Q&As below.

I'd be interested to hear what others think (men and women).

1.) How did you get into the Industry?

I took a couple of courses including the BA Communication and Media Production at Bournemouth Uni. Then I freelanced in the community and corporate side of TV production for a while until I got a few broadcast jobs

2.) Were you always interested in the sound aspect of the industry?

Yes, but I was initially interested in the picture and directing side too. It wasn't until I was at college and had the chance to do some proper sound recording on lots of different projects that I got interested in doing it as a job in itself.

3.) With 17 years experience you must have definitely recorded all sorts of sounds. Is there any recording that stands out for some reason. Whether it was because it was funny/easy/difficult?

I recorded a circumcision of two young girls in Cameroon. It still haunts me.

4.) What made you decide to go into freelance?

I complete lack of staff jobs, particularly for new entrants in 1990 when I left college.

5.) Since the cutbacks have been made in the TV Industry, have you noticed a difference in the amount of work you have received being freelance?

Which cutbacks! There have been continual cutbacks since I joined the industry. We are feeling the impact of the "credit crunch" now and it's obvious production companies are feeling the pinch too.

6.) Have you had to update a lot of your technical gear in order to keep updated with the bigger companies equipment?

Sound gear doesn't tend to date and go obsolete as quickly as the camera gear does. Saying that I have in the last year of so sold two DAT machines and bought a hard drive recorder and a flash recorder so we are moving onto tapeless technology as far as sound is concerned.

The other main pressure on equipment at the moment is the withdrawal of the channel 69 radio mic frequencies in 2012 which will mean that we are all going to have to replace all our radio mic equipment.

7.) From the beginning of your career, have you ever received prejudiced views towards the way in which people see you; as in your a female that works in the sound industry and this is rather rare.

That's a difficult one to answer. I've found 99.9% of the people I've actually worked with to be very accepting. Maybe there are those who would be prejudiced but they most likely choose not to work with me - I rarely get to hear about that so I wouldn't know how often that happens. I get the feeling that happens less often nowadays than when I first started. There's a lot of women training at the National Film School and coming into the industry at the moment so things are changing.

Other crew and production staff have expressed surprise at me doing the job but that's not necessarily prejudice, that's become voiced less often over the years as well.

When I rang a big and very well known television equipment supplier sometime in the early 90's and asked about microphones. They treated my like an idiot, had never heard of the Schoeps mic I was asking about and told me "Everyone uses Shiner mics". "Everyone? Shiner?" I asked, I'd never heard of them. I felt like a right moron. I'd been trained for 5 years worked in the industry for a couple and never heard of these Shiner mics that EVERYONE was using. He said "I'll send you a brochure and if you want to know about microphones ask a sound man". Two days later the brochure arrived for "Sennheiser"microphones, yes a lot of people use them but certainly not everyone, it's not pronounced anything like "Shiner" and I am a soundman! Well sort of. I was furious for days. That company has since gone one of business and I'm still here so I guess I've had the last laugh so far.

8.) Do you think that more women are beginning to believe that at last women are being accepted into the television industry and especially those of the engineering

I really don't know. I hope so, I hope they have believed it for some time. I never really thought about that as a reason not to do it. It's never bothered me at all that I mainly work with men but it's nice to see more women coming into the industry on the technical side.


9.) Do you think that the audio part of the industry isn't filled with women because they think they don't have a chance at getting a job, or is it because they're simply not interested?

Saying you haven't got into the industry because of other peoples prejudice is a neat way of shifting the blame isn't it? I'm not saying that prejudice doesn't exist but neither am I arrogant enough to think that I managed to get into the industry because I am some kind of amazing person, so it must be possible. It can be a hard industry to get into anyway whoever you are.

My job can be quite physical and maybe some women (and equally some men) don't want to stand in a muddy field in the rain with a mixer round their neck and holding a pole with a weight on the end over their head....

10.) Do you personally think there is still a lot of stereotypes held within todays sound/audio society?

I don't know about sound in particular but in TV production yes. I've had male sound recordists moan at me when I get jobs because they have asked for "a women on the crew" or "a sympathetic crew". It's sometimes for a valid reason but sometimes it's because it's about babies or children, emotional or some such. The guys say to me "but we are sympathetic, we are dads, we know about kids and we know about emotions, you don't have kids, what do you have to qualify you for that job that we don't?" While I'm sure there has been lots of discrimination the other way round in the past that does not take away from the fact that they have a point, don't they?

I stamp on the use of the job description "soundman" wherever I see it. I used not to mind it but now I feel it just perpetuates the myth that this is a job that is always done my men. On reflection I don't think it's even an acceptable term for male sound recordists to use for themselves and it should be stamped out. There are plenty of non gender specific job descriptions they can use. Replacing the term "Cameraman" is more difficult as I accept Camerperson or Cameraman/woman is a bit clumsy but it has to go!

Labels: